AJ Journal of Medical Sciences

Volume: 2 Issue: 2

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Scalpels Shadow: Unveiling the Burden of Surgical Site Infection in a Tertiary Care Centre

T Lissna1, Prajna Sharma2,∗

1Family Health Centre, Wayanad, Kerala, India.
2Department of Microbiology, AJ Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
 

Corresponding author.
Prajna Sharma
[email protected]

Year: 2025, Page: 101-105, Doi: https://doi.org/10.71325/ajjms.v2i2.25.34

Received: June 21, 2025 Accepted: Aug. 25, 2025 Published: Sept. 1, 2025

Abstract

Background: Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) are the third most commonly reported nosocomial infection, which has an adverse impact on the hospital as well as on the patient. Approximately 0.5% to 3% of patients undergoing surgery will experience infection at or adjacent to the surgical incision site. Compared with patients undergoing surgery who do not have a surgical site infection, those with a surgical site infection are hospitalized approximately 7 to 11 days longer 1. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of SSIs, identify associated risk factors, characterize the microbial etiology, and assess antimicrobial resistance patterns in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Materials and Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted over one year (January-December 2023) at a tertiary care centre, South India. A total of 87 post-operative patients with clinically suspected SSIs were enrolled. Wound swabs and pus samples were collected and cultured. Bacterial isolates were identified using standard microbiological techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method by CLSI guidelines. Results: Among the 87 patients, positive culture growth was obtained in 62.07% of cases. The highest incidence of SSIs was noted in the 41-50 year age group (32.6%). SSIs were more common in males (68.6%) than in females. The majority of infections were associated with procedures from general Surgery (49%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent isolate (25.6%), followed by Escherichia coli (14.0%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.5%). Gram-positive isolates were uniformly sensitive to Tetracycline and Linezolid. Gram-negative organisms exhibited multidrug resistance, with the highest sensitivity noted to Carbapenems and Aminoglycosides. The overall SSI rate at the institution was 2.2%. Conclusion: This study underscores the continued burden of SSIs, particularly among general surgical patients. Early detection and targeted antimicrobial therapy, guided by local antibiograms, are essential. Rational antibiotic use and stringent infection control measures can significantly reduce SSI rates and improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: Surgical site infections, Multi-drug resistant Enterobacteriaciae, MRSA

References

  1. Seidelman JL, Mantyh CR, Anderson DJ. Surgical Site Infection PreventionJAMA. 2023;329(3):244–252. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.24075

  2. VT, AS, BMR, Lakshminarayana SA. A Study on Surgical Site Infections and Associated Risk Factors in General Surgeries at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional StudyEMJ Microbiology. 2023;4(1):109–116. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33590/emjmicrobiolinfectdis/10301081

  3. Reichman DE, Greenberg JA. Reducing surgical site infections: a reviewReviews in obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;2(4):212–221. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2812878/

  4. Shiferaw WS, Aynalem YA, Akalu TY, Petrucka PM. Surgical site infection and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysisBMC Surgery. 2020;20(1):107. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00764-1

  5. M35-A2, Abbreviated Identification of Bacteria and Yeast; Approved Guideline—Second Edition. November 2008. Available from: https://clsi.org/shop/standards/m35/

  6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). M100-Ed34: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 34th edition. February 2024. Available from: https://clsi.org/shop/standards/m100/

  7. Allegranzi B, Nejad SB, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, et al. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet. 2011;377(9761):228–241. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61458-4

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Surgical site infection (SSI) 2010. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/ssi/ssi.html

  9. World Health Organization (WHO). The burden of health care-associated infection worldwide. 2010. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-burden-of-health-care-associated-infection-worldwide.Lastaccessed

  10. Narendranath V, Nandakumar BS, Sarala KS. Epidemiology of hospital-acquired infections in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India: a cross-sectional study of 79401 inpatientsInternational Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2017;4(2):335–339. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20170063

  11. Satyanarayana V. Study of surgical site infections in abdominal surgeriesJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011;5(5):935–939. Available from: https://www.jcdr.net/articles/pdf/1814/7%20-%203357.pdf

  12. Nidhi P. Bacteriological profile of surgical site infections (SSIS) and its Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern at a tertiary care hospitalInternational Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2019;8(7):113–121.

  13. Bastola R, Parajuli P, Neupane A, Paudel A. Surgical Site infections: Distribution Studies of Sample, Outcome and Antimicrobial Susceptibility TestingJournal of Medical Microbiology & Diagnosis. 2017;06(01):1–7. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2161-0703.1000252

  14. Chada CKR, Kandati J, Ponugoti M. A prospective study of surgical site infections in a tertiary care hospitalInternational Surgery Journal. 2017;4(6):1945–1952. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20172109

  15. Allegranzi B, Aiken AM, Kubilay NZ, Nthumba P, Barasa J, Okumu G, et al. A multimodal infection control and patient safety intervention to reduce surgical site infections in Africa: a multicentre, before–after, cohort studyThe Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2018;18(5):507–515. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30107-5

  16. Akhter MS, Verma R, Madhukar KP, Vaishampayan AR, Unadkat PC. Incidence of surgical site infection in postoperative patients at a tertiary care centre in IndiaJournal of Wound Care. 2016;25(4):210–217. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2016.25.4.210

  17. Giridhar T, Priya PP, PG. Surgical site infections: a study of incidence, risk factors & antimicrobial sensitivity at RIMS, Kadapa, A.PMedicine Journal of Evolution of medical and Dental Sciences. 2015;4(64):11187–11192. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2015/1611

  18. Mundhada AS, Tenpe S. A study of organisms causing surgical site infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility in a tertiary care Government HospitalIndian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology. 2015;58(2):195–200. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0377-4929.155313

  19. Shahane V, Bhawal S, Lele U. Surgical Site Infections : A One Year Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care CenterInternational Journal of Health Sciences. 2012;6(1):79–84. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.12816/0005976

Cite this article

T Lissna, Prajna Sharma. Scalpels Shadow: Unveiling the Burden of Surgical Site Infection in a Tertiary Care Centre. AJ J Med Sci 2025;2(2):101-105

Views
88
Downloads
37
Citations