AJ Journal of Medical Sciences

Volume: 2 Issue: 2

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

A Comparative Study Between Subjective and Objective Findings of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Deepalakshmi Tantry1, C S Chethana2, G Mahesh Santhraya3, R S Chithra4, Apoorva B Patil4,∗, Naisiri Hegde4

1Associate Professor, Department of ENT, A.J Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
2Senior Resident, Department of ENT, A.J Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
3Professor and HOD, Department of ENT, A.J Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
4Postgraduate, Department of ENT, A.J Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Corresponding author.
Apoorva B Patil
[email protected]

Year: 2025, Page: 83-87, Doi: https://doi.org/10.71325/ajjms.v2i2.25.25

Received: May 5, 2025 Accepted: May 27, 2025 Published: July 17, 2025

Abstract

Background & Objective: Chronic rhinosinusitis is common cause of morbidity and impaired performance at school or workplace. The disease is extremely common. A definitive diagnosis and timely intervention can reduce morbidity of disease. Primary objective is to correlate the subjective symptoms with objective findings. Methods: A cross sectional study with 50 patients who is diagnosed of CRS based on Taskforce criteria. Then they were subjected to nasal endoscopy and computed tomography and scores noted. The scores were compared with respect to symptoms. Results: In this study, total patients studied were 50. Mean age was 35.88 years (SD-14.84428) with male to female ratio 1.5:1. The most common symptom was nasal obstruction (84%), followed by headache (80%), nasal discharge (68%), hyposmia/anosmia (56%), facial pain and pressure (28%). The mean CT scan score for all symptoms was found to be 6.42 and the endoscopic score mean was 3.00. Conclusion: Both nasal endoscopy and CT are important preoperative evaluation tools in detecting pathology and both are complementary to each other.

Keywords: Chronic rhinosinusitis, TFR criteria, CT scan, DNE, Paranasal sinus

References

  1. Benninger MS. Rhinosinusitis. In: Scott-Brown’s Otolaryngology, Bibliography Head and Neck surgery (7). .

  2. Bhattacharyya N. Symptom and Disease Severity Differences Between Nasal Septal Deviation and Chronic RhinosinusitisOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 2005;133:173–177. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2005.03.082

  3. Vining EM, Yanagisawa K, Yanagisawa E. The importance of preoperative nasal endoscopy in patients with sinonasal diseaseLaryngoscope. 1993;103(5):512–519. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199305000-00006

  4. Pearlman AN, Conley DB. Review of current guidelines related to the diagnosis and treatment of rhinosinusitisCurrent Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery. 2008;16(3):226–230. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/moo.0b013e3282fdcc9a

  5. Bhattacharyya N. Radiographic stage fails to predict symptom outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitisLaryngoscope. 2006;116(1):18–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000192284.22703.04

  6. Reiss M, Neumann U, Reiss G. Importance of computer tomography in preoperative diagnostics of polyposis nasiWiener klinische Wochenschrift. 2000;112(19):851–854. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11098537/

  7. Winstead W. RhinosinusitisPrim Care. 2003;30(1):137–154. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4543(02)00058-1

  8. Wabnitz DAM, Nair S, Wormald P. Correlation between Preoperative Symptom Scores, Quality-of-Life Questionnaires, and Staging with Computed Tomography in Patients with Chronic RhinosinusitisAmerican Journal of Rhinology. 2005;19(1):91–96. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15794082/

  9. Ling FTK, Kountakis SE. Advances in imaging of the paranasal sinusesCurrent Allergy and Asthma Reports. 2006;6(6):502–507. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-006-0028-1

  10. Nayak SR, Desai PV, Kirtane MV. Functional endoscopic sinus surgeryIndian Journal of Otolaryngology. 1991;43(3):126–129 . Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02994105

  11. Lilly-Tariah OBd. Pattern of clinical features of chronic simple rhinosinusitis in Port HarcourtNigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2006;9(2):142–146. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17319347/

  12. Gandotra SC, Matvani G, Kapoor R, Choudhary N. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery results in 69 patientsIndian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 1999 ;52(1):5–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02996422

  13. Mógica JD, Rodríguez GG, Díaz SNG, Escamilla JAG, González CC. Chronic rhinosinusitis: predominant symptoms in children under 14 years of age who were seen at the Regional Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Allergic DiseasesRevista Alergia México. 1996;43. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9053130/

  14. Arango P, Kountakis SE. Significance of Computed Tomography Pathology in Chronic RhinosinusitisThe Laryngoscope. 2001;111(10):1779–1782. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200110000-00022

  15. Kountakis SE, Arango P, Bradley D, Wade ZK, Borish L. Molecular and Cellular Staging for the Severity of Chronic RhinosinusitisThe Laryngoscope. 2004;114(11):1895–1905. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000147917.43615.c0

  16. Bhattacharyya N, Fried MP. The Accuracy of Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Chronic RhinosinusitisThe Laryngoscope. 2003;113(1):125–129. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200301000-00023

Cite this article

Deepalakshmi Tantry, C S Chethana, G Mahesh Santhraya, R S Chithra, Apoorva B Patil, Naisiri Hegde. A Comparative Study Between Subjective and Objective Findings of Chronic Rhinosinusitis. AJ J Med Sci 2025;2(2):83–87

Views
94
Downloads
45
Citations